To be able to answer the question I pose to you properly, you must first understand what a law is, who has the authority to enact laws, and under what authority do THEY act, and for what purpose are laws enacted? Now, if that body of elected representatives passes a law which infringes upon a right, even in even the slightest degree, are you Breaking the law is morally justified any obligation to obey it?
This political judgment, moreover, is not simply or primarily a right, but like self-preservation, a duty to God. By the very act of drafting and signing the Declaration of Independence they were committing treason against their government.
Intelligent comments and questions may be submitted to: The member-supported Council of Canadians has engaged in all sorts of civil disobedience, including sandbagging towns and provincial legislatures to point out how rising sea levels would affect them.
His natural rights are the foundation of all his civil rights. Can you do that for me, just this once? Therefore, will all the information I have provided, do you think that breaking the law could ever be considered as justified?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse.
Earlier this month, the government quietly tabled its annual report on how Canada is doing in meeting its targets under the Kyoto Protocol and other international obligations.
It delayed mass logging in B. All delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. It is the first and foremost of our inalienable rights without which we can preserve no other. This great nation was founded by men who believed that their obligation to stand up for their rights superseded ANY law passed by men.
The simple truth is that those men who founded this nation, whom we all revere, were all lawbreakers. You have heard me time and time again discuss how our government is infringing, or restricting our rights, yet I have not gone into a great deal of detail into the origin of those rights.
Greenpeace, to name one group, has specialized in it. And what of those whose job it is to uphold or enforce questionable laws enacted by government?
First, the International Energy Association IEA announced global greenhouse gas emissions hit record highs inthreatening to catapult Earth over the 2C rise in temperature that, scientists predict, will lead to cataclysmic changes.
Population and economic growth, oil and gas exports and our love of light trucks have been among the key drivers of our rising emissions. They were later charged. Although there is some political disagreement, the general scientific consensus is that in order to head off mass extinctions, huge migrations of climate refugees and, yes, global warring, carbon dioxide emissions should be cut back to parts per million from the current or so.
I just hope that you have a high tolerance for pain, because when reality slaps you in the face it is going to hurt like hell. If they are sworn to uphold the Constitution, and they enforce laws which violate the rights of the people, does that make them criminals as well?
You may not agree with that, but the facts prove that the primary job of our government is to protect our rights; everything else was secondary.
Witness police actions against non-violent stunts such as teddy bear catapults at global summits, or citizen complaints of tied-up traffic during demonstrations. However, the government which we currently live under did not always exist.
On a per-capita basis, Canada has much to answer for. Like I said, you may not agree with that, but that is your emotions speaking for you, not your brain evaluating the facts as I have presented them to you up to this point.
Manage Profile Sign Out This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only.May 22, · Are we ever morally justified to break the law? is it ever right to break the law for justice i am writing a paper on how katniss from the hunger games is used as a vigilantly hero and how breaking the law is justified?Status: Open.
Breaking the law is morally justifiable and acceptable when the law in itself is iniquitous and if that law violates human rights and conscience; Certainly, rules are established for us to follow but we as human beings should be able to differentiate the right and the wrong and incase laws need to be violated for the right cause even with hard.
Nov 22, · Choice: What circumstances justify breaking the law? I believe that breaking the law is justified only when the law itself is unjust.
For example, the Fugitive Slave Act made it illegal to assist a slave in running away. people helped these slaves because they felt morally obligated.
Looking back on these law breakers now. Breaking the law is morally justifiable and acceptable when the law in itself is iniquitous and if that law violates human rights and breaking the law can be justified. Breaking the rules can be the best thing to do in a particular situation.
It may not be right according to the rules but it might be what the best thing to do is. For. In your own opinion, could breaking the law ever be justified? k Views · View Upvoters. Thank you for your feedback! When is breaking the law through acts of civil disobedience morally justified? How did Gandhi justify his intentions to break the law regarding the salt collection?
Ask New Question. Question: Is Breaking the Law Ever Justified? Posted on December 20, by neal Some of you are probably already asking if the title .Download